<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holy spam!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stwsim.wordpress.com/2008/08/22/holy-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stwsim.wordpress.com/2008/08/22/holy-spam/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 04:55:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: stwsim</title>
		<link>http://stwsim.wordpress.com/2008/08/22/holy-spam/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>stwsim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stwsim.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Yes, constant maintenance is certainly the key.  

The exchange rules are good, but like anything they are only as good as their last update.  Lately I&#039;ve been getting a lot of &quot;greetingcard&quot; type emails in my inbox.  I find Outlook&#039;s junk mail filter wants to just block the sender (which seems to be different on every piece of spam), so I generally create a rule along the lines of &quot;if email contains text xxxxxx, move to junk mail&quot;.

Lately though I&#039;ve run into a limit in the amount of rules Outlook/Exchange allows.  I&#039;ve been retiring old ones to make way for the new ones, so far that seems to be ok.

What I&#039;d like to do, and haven&#039;t looked into it yet to see if it is possible, is share my rules with the other folks in the company: so if I create a rule that says &quot;if email contains text xxxxxx, move to junk mail&quot;, everyone else here also gets that rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, constant maintenance is certainly the key.  </p>
<p>The exchange rules are good, but like anything they are only as good as their last update.  Lately I&#8217;ve been getting a lot of &#8220;greetingcard&#8221; type emails in my inbox.  I find Outlook&#8217;s junk mail filter wants to just block the sender (which seems to be different on every piece of spam), so I generally create a rule along the lines of &#8220;if email contains text xxxxxx, move to junk mail&#8221;.</p>
<p>Lately though I&#8217;ve run into a limit in the amount of rules Outlook/Exchange allows.  I&#8217;ve been retiring old ones to make way for the new ones, so far that seems to be ok.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d like to do, and haven&#8217;t looked into it yet to see if it is possible, is share my rules with the other folks in the company: so if I create a rule that says &#8220;if email contains text xxxxxx, move to junk mail&#8221;, everyone else here also gets that rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terry Lewis</title>
		<link>http://stwsim.wordpress.com/2008/08/22/holy-spam/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>terry Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 01:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stwsim.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Simon,

You are certainly getting more spam than I. I would say my average seems to be about 5% of my email is valid emails either from known people or from newsletters and other sources like Tiger Direct from which I don&#039;t mind receiving info from.

One solution that I have heard of is one where anyone who is sending an email to you must be validated first. It sounds like a good solution but I have not been brave enough to try it yet myself.

One thing I have been very strict with is telling the Microsoft Junk Email tool what emails are junk mail. It takes me about 2 minutes each day but it certainly does seem to have helped to keep that &#039;crap&#039; out of my inbox.

I heard that the City of Toronto system administrators have estimated that about 98% of the email that goes through their network and servers is some kind of spam.

Would it not be nice if we could just send it back to the originator on a regular basis. I wonder how long they would  last?

Terry Lewis
www.tmhrconsulting.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon,</p>
<p>You are certainly getting more spam than I. I would say my average seems to be about 5% of my email is valid emails either from known people or from newsletters and other sources like Tiger Direct from which I don&#8217;t mind receiving info from.</p>
<p>One solution that I have heard of is one where anyone who is sending an email to you must be validated first. It sounds like a good solution but I have not been brave enough to try it yet myself.</p>
<p>One thing I have been very strict with is telling the Microsoft Junk Email tool what emails are junk mail. It takes me about 2 minutes each day but it certainly does seem to have helped to keep that &#8216;crap&#8217; out of my inbox.</p>
<p>I heard that the City of Toronto system administrators have estimated that about 98% of the email that goes through their network and servers is some kind of spam.</p>
<p>Would it not be nice if we could just send it back to the originator on a regular basis. I wonder how long they would  last?</p>
<p>Terry Lewis<br />
<a href="http://www.tmhrconsulting.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tmhrconsulting.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
